The Tao and the Virtue Classic

Truths can be spoken, but not the absolute truth; therefore a truth suited to discourse wouldn’t be the truth itself.

What cannot be named is the source itself.
Having names is the common denominator of all things.

Given this, have no partiality in order to contemplate the mystery.
Always have intention to see objectively.
These both mean the same, yet differ in definition. My repeating it suggests the profundity of this point.

A depth of greater understanding leads to a threshold.

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

Explore posts in the same categories: Lao tzu, tao, tao te ching, taoism, taoist

This entry was posted on May 11, 2010 at 1:31 pm and is filed under Lao tzu, tao, tao te ching, taoism, taoist. You can subscribe via RSS 2.0 feed to this post's comments. You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Not published)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

John Emmett